Search found 4 matches

by myrddin
Thu Mar 17, 2005 9:10 am
Forum: General chat
Topic: Unnecessary change?
Replies: 13
Views: 9606

Re: Unnecessary change?


In addition to what Syzop said, I'd also like to point out that I personally have had at least 10 different users come and ask for the text to be changed. So it might seem unimportant to you, but it really did bother some people.

Point taken.

I asked why, and I was told.
Thank you both for ...
by myrddin
Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:46 pm
Forum: General chat
Topic: Unnecessary change?
Replies: 13
Views: 9606

I suppose nobody with criticism had the great idea of reading the Changes file ?? .. :P
- Changed the 'is a Secure Connection' msg/numeric in /whois from RPL_WHOISSPECIAL to
a slightly changed RPL_WHOISSECURE, namely: ':%s 671 %s %s :is using a Secure connection',
I'm sure some client coders ...
by myrddin
Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:33 am
Forum: General chat
Topic: Unnecessary change?
Replies: 13
Views: 9606

Dunno on the numeric, but the text was for better grammer it seems.

Why does it even matter? 99% of the people won't care.. Only the ones who use fluffy whois things and junk. Works fine for me

Well then I guess I'm your 1% that care.
Why does it matter? Because now there's clients that don't ...
by myrddin
Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:48 am
Forum: General chat
Topic: Unnecessary change?
Replies: 13
Views: 9606

Unnecessary change?


- Changed numeric&text of 'is a Secure Connection' to 'is using a Secure Connection', client coders are encouraged to add support for this new numeric 671. Until then, in-window-/whois's will probably be broken.


This is just my opinion, which doesn't matter to most people anyway, but the above ...