A more secure way to distribute users over the irc net ?
A more secure way to distribute users over the irc net ?
Hi folks greetings from Argentina, as a novice user i got many questions to ask but in this time i will ask just one: Is there any way to distribute the users over my irc net without the need of a random domain ? making public only one ip ? for example getting a hub to act like a collector where all the users log in and then redirect them to other servers ? . remember that i am a novice user ! dont get mad on me if this is an impossible
Look !!! , Can you see the light on my finger ?Open your mind PD: my english sucks
It is impossible for load balancing for the connection. You could use a round-robin proxy, but then all users would have to go through that computer's connection and would all appear to the ircd to have the same ip, making g/klines impossible.
The only way to really do what you want is to have a domain name whose DNS entry has multiple A records, but then the other IPs would be visible. Sorry.
The only way to really do what you want is to have a domain name whose DNS entry has multiple A records, but then the other IPs would be visible. Sorry.
Why the hell can't my signature be empty?
"Your message contains too few characters."
"Your message contains too few characters."
Their system sucks, yes. olene had an interesting idea on this topic, but it'd require extensions to the servers. See: http://olene.net/rofl/prm.txt
Of course, such a system would really only work for the larger networks or a network with resources to burn .
Of course, such a system would really only work for the larger networks or a network with resources to burn .
-ChatSpike IRC Network [http://www.chatspike.net]
-Denora Stats [http://denora.nomadirc.net]
-Omerta [http://www.barafranca.com]
-Denora Stats [http://denora.nomadirc.net]
-Omerta [http://www.barafranca.com]
Well, on my network I use a "round robin" type of DNS. With zoneedit, all I do is just set up new A entries with the same name but different IPs to direct to.
I.E. Say server1 has IP 1.2.3.4 and server2 has IP 5.6.7.8
Here's how my address entries would look:
irc.mynet.com -> 1.2.3.4
irc.mynet.com -> 5.6.7.8
The DNS servers are in charge of splitting the load between the different servers, and it works flawlessly for me. The only disadvantage to this would be if a server went down for an extended period of time, the DNS wouldn't realize this, and users would get "Connection Timed Out" messages while DNS was forwarding to that particular IP address.
I.E. Say server1 has IP 1.2.3.4 and server2 has IP 5.6.7.8
Here's how my address entries would look:
irc.mynet.com -> 1.2.3.4
irc.mynet.com -> 5.6.7.8
The DNS servers are in charge of splitting the load between the different servers, and it works flawlessly for me. The only disadvantage to this would be if a server went down for an extended period of time, the DNS wouldn't realize this, and users would get "Connection Timed Out" messages while DNS was forwarding to that particular IP address.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:26 am
- Location: irc://irc.winbots.org/Winbots
- Contact:
yes that is the most common, but it is easy to get a list of all ips listed for a domain, http://dnsstuff.com/TNLTRPB wrote:Well, on my network I use a "round robin" type of DNS. With zoneedit, all I do is just set up new A entries with the same name but different IPs to direct to.
I.E. Say server1 has IP 1.2.3.4 and server2 has IP 5.6.7.8
Here's how my address entries would look:
irc.mynet.com -> 1.2.3.4
irc.mynet.com -> 5.6.7.8
The DNS servers are in charge of splitting the load between the different servers, and it works flawlessly for me. The only disadvantage to this would be if a server went down for an extended period of time, the DNS wouldn't realize this, and users would get "Connection Timed Out" messages while DNS was forwarding to that particular IP address.
secure? you don't want it to be secure, people NEED to know the IP address in order to connectkuato wrote:Yeap , the most common way is to create a random domain but it isnt secure enough, any alternative to that ?
if people are connecting, they will be able to get the IP address, regardless of how you route the info, share the load, unless you use proxies.
connect to a server, run netstat and presto, there are the IP's of all connections
Never argue with an idiot. They will bring you down to their level, then beat you with experience.