I was wondering, after looking in the umodes.c, if it was possible to reactivate the invisible mode for all users. if so how? I have a proposal but I am unsure, and don't know how to test it without installing it on one of my servers.
Tell me if this is correct, if not how to correct it:
;this is the line i found in the umode.c
UmodeAdd(NULL, 'i', UMODE_GLOBAL, NULL, &UMODE_INVISIBLE);
;if it were changed to this would it work or is it more indepth than that?!?
UmodeAdd(NULL, 'i', UMODE_GLOBAL, umode_allow_all, &UMODE_INVISIBLE);
any help would be much appreciated because I will not update my server set until I have the stealth/invisible function back.
Invisible mode (+i)
NOT A CHANCE! +I is immortal!
We DO NOT SUPPORT any modifcations of the code!
Nor do we support adding modules back that were removed... I think you can pay to add it back... But as far as that goes the coders do not like adding it.
Failure in updating will also deny you help. We do not support any previous versions of Unreal.
We DO NOT SUPPORT any modifcations of the code!
Nor do we support adding modules back that were removed... I think you can pay to add it back... But as far as that goes the coders do not like adding it.
Failure in updating will also deny you help. We do not support any previous versions of Unreal.
FBSD-DEV Project
http://www.fbsd-dev.org
YatesDev Hosting
http://www.yatesdev.com
The Wrong Way
http://www.thewrongway.net
http://www.fbsd-dev.org
YatesDev Hosting
http://www.yatesdev.com
The Wrong Way
http://www.thewrongway.net
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 2:15 am
now was that being facetious ? or is that all truth? The part about the not having the mode anymore? (I fully understand the ramifications for ceasing to update)
But I thought that this was a community based project where community support and modification was encouraged. Strikes me as a bit odd, not to be. But at anyrate, if the above is the case I suppose that another service is required
But I thought that this was a community based project where community support and modification was encouraged. Strikes me as a bit odd, not to be. But at anyrate, if the above is the case I suppose that another service is required
Everyone can put himself +i already, which is even recommended and therefore usually done automatically by the server and/or client.
But unfortunately I got the same feeling as jewles that you ment +I (upcase i), then see [Faq] Other - Invisibility (usermode +I) doesn't work. It is not ever going to come back.
Also, when you are at it, read [Faq] Other - Why is modifying the source not supported?, or actually... perhaps it's a good time to read the whole FAQ :p.
But unfortunately I got the same feeling as jewles that you ment +I (upcase i), then see [Faq] Other - Invisibility (usermode +I) doesn't work. It is not ever going to come back.
Also, when you are at it, read [Faq] Other - Why is modifying the source not supported?, or actually... perhaps it's a good time to read the whole FAQ :p.