SSL for /oper

Jason · Post by **Jason** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 5:13 pm

What the FCK. It is! DIE ANCIENT TOPIC *locks*

You guys should have phpBB auto-lock anything inactive longer than a month. Theres a modification for it.

Post by **Syzop** » Sun Sep 25, 2005 5:32 pm

Oh yeah, blame us! (j/k ;p)

Sometimes additions can be useful though, so I'm not so in favor of autolock :).

w00t · Post by **w00t** » Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:36 am

*nod* although repeated unhelpful/unwanted additions aren't.. :p

sdamon · Post by **sdamon** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:01 pm

*Is aware of re-reserection*

Adding an option to the oper block like oper::require-ssl would cover ya...

Post by **Syzop** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:37 pm

resurection.. fine, but.. did you actually read all what was mentioned? it has been pointed out it is simply a bad idea (see angrywolf's post), and oper ssl certs are a much better alternative.

sdamon · Post by **sdamon** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:17 pm

huh wha? requireing a user to be connected via ssl inorder to issue the oper command is a bad idea? *crack*

and i didnt know that unreal supported secure key authentication

Post by **Syzop** » Mon Jan 30, 2006 11:08 pm

Well, now I know for sure you didn't read the previous messages before replying...... OMG...