Page 2 of 2

Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2004 2:50 pm
by codemastr
SLipKnOt wrote: yeah i find they use they fullname common but they use "*" as their full name.. for this i cant ban them :( from ircd
Why not?

ban realname {
mask "\*";
reason "Some kind of drone";
};

Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:49 am
by SLipKnOt
codemastr wrote: Why not?

ban realname {
mask "\*";
reason "Some kind of drone";
};
hehe thanks for show me the way :) but what i gonna do for the random :(
Client exiting: jpvteb (~hywr@ip24-136-41-200.ga.at.cox.net)
Client exiting: zggmof (~jfiu@pcp08388265pcs.maplln01.de.comcast.net)
Client exiting: zhgbaf (~xmjk@blk-224-207-159.eastlink.ca)

Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2004 5:53 am
by SLipKnOt
w00t wrote:Banning based on ctcp replies is a really bad idea... go talk to the defender people, they should probably be able to investigate into it and give you a hand.

I'd offer myself, but I'm busy with other projects at the moment. Still, drop me a line and I'll try get round to it.
Banning based on ctcp replies is not that bad i think :$ . Well if u got sometime then take a look :)