Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:58 pm
yeah, those are not "random" enough.. or actually: it could be legit nicks/words, that's why it doesn't kill them.
Basically what antirandom checks is combination of letters that are (very) uncommon for english language (eg: qgn).
Something like 'scib', 'ufws' and 'kjax' could all be "legit" :p.
Another thing is that the "random part" of the nicks are too short to get a reasonable score I guess.
[I didn't feed them into antirandom to see what happens, but those things come to my mind -- perhaps there is room for improvement, but we are talking near-limits here]
So basically, that's a limitation of antirandom... I'm afraid it cannot do everything for you ;). Since there's a clear pattern, I guess you'll have to spamfilter w/target u ;p.
Basically what antirandom checks is combination of letters that are (very) uncommon for english language (eg: qgn).
Something like 'scib', 'ufws' and 'kjax' could all be "legit" :p.
Another thing is that the "random part" of the nicks are too short to get a reasonable score I guess.
[I didn't feed them into antirandom to see what happens, but those things come to my mind -- perhaps there is room for improvement, but we are talking near-limits here]
So basically, that's a limitation of antirandom... I'm afraid it cannot do everything for you ;). Since there's a clear pattern, I guess you'll have to spamfilter w/target u ;p.