Page 1 of 1
Anope SSL
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 10:35 pm
by pstruh22
Hi
I using unrealICRD+SSL and Anope 1.7.8
Its possilbe to connect Anope services to SSL port ?
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:11 pm
by commandr
Anope doesn't support SSL
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:13 pm
by pstruh22
commandr wrote:Anope doesn't support SSL
OK,
If Anope doesn't support SSL, and is connected to non-SSL port, can user sniffing comunication between me an Nickserv ? Can he stolen my registered password to nickserv ?
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:19 pm
by commandr
hums.. I suppose that no
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:21 pm
by commandr
install a firewall in your computer
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:24 pm
by pstruh22
I need encrypted comunication between me and services. Firewall I have instaled.
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:25 pm
by Syzop
uh, a firewall doesn't protect against sniffing ;).
Anyway... stuff can only be sniffed if an attacker has control over a device (eg: a computer) in the path between ircserver<----this---->anope.
If you link anope via localhost to your irc server (or in any other way does not cross a LAN/WAN/whatever), then it cannot be sniffed
[uh ok, it can be sniffed, but only by persons on that host and if you got rood/admin privileges]
So, if services are on another server than your IRCd, then you could either install an ircd at that server, or you could run something like stunnel @ your services location and let services connect to the stunnel, then the topology is: ircserver<------SSL secure connection--->stunnel<-->anope.
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:31 pm
by pstruh22
I am linking anope via localhost to my irc server. It running on same localhost as ircd server which support SSL.
I am connected to IRCD via SSL, Services not.
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 12:07 am
by pstruh22
and what about attack man-in-the-middle ?
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 1:05 am
by Caedmon
As it's been said, If Services are connected to your network locally, then there is no way someone can "sniff" your password. Especially if you're connected to the server as an SSL Client
Posted: Sun Mar 06, 2005 2:35 am
by codemastr
pstruh22 wrote:and what about attack man-in-the-middle ?
I take it you have no idea what a man-in-the-middle attack is? It has absolutely nothing to do with this scenario. If it is on the local machine, there can be no man-in-the-middle attack because there is no man and no middle! The communication is direct - it's the same machine!